Last updated: 2026-09-10 5 min read

A convecting fin combines conduction inside a solid with convection from its surface to the surrounding fluid. This case checks that fixed-temperature, adiabatic, and convective boundary conditions are assembled consistently with the conduction constitutive law and the overall energy balance.

What this case verifies

  • Coupling of Fourier conduction and Newton's law of cooling
  • Fixed-temperature base, convective sides, and adiabatic tip
  • Surface integration of the convection coefficient and exposed perimeter
  • The full axial temperature profile, not only a single nodal value

Problem definition

Fin Convection boundary conditions

The straight fin has constant cross-sectional area AcA_c and perimeter PP . Its base is held at Tb=400T_b=400 K. The four side faces use h=169h=169 W/m²K and T=300T_\infty=300 K, while the tip has zero heat flux. Thermal conductivity kk and the convection coefficient are constant, and radiation is neglected.

Reference solution

Defining excess temperature as θ=TT\theta=T-T_\infty gives the steady one-dimensional fin equation

d2θdx2m2θ=0,m=hPkAc\frac{d^2\theta}{dx^2}-m^2\theta=0, \qquad m=\sqrt{\frac{hP}{kA_c}}

Applying θ(0)=TbT\theta(0)=T_b-T_\infty and dθ/dxx=L=0d\theta/dx|_{x=L}=0 yields

T(x)TTbT=cosh[m(Lx)]cosh(mL)\frac{T(x)-T_\infty}{T_b-T_\infty} =\frac{\cosh[m(L-x)]}{\cosh(mL)}

The adiabatic-tip temperature is therefore

T(L)=T+TbTcosh(mL)T(L)=T_\infty+\frac{T_b-T_\infty}{\cosh(mL)}

Neither a correct conduction implementation nor a correct convection implementation alone is sufficient to reproduce this solution; the test exercises both physics contributions and their boundary integration.

Results

Fin Convection temperature

QuantityTheoryFEMError
Tip temperature TtipT_{tip}331.03 K331.03 K~0%

The tip temperature is effectively exact, and the entire axial profile agrees with the hyperbolic-cosine solution to within 0.1%. Agreement over the profile demonstrates that the result is not a coincidental match at one point.

Engineering significance

The case underpins thermal analysis of motor housings, cooling fins, and heat sinks. Real natural or forced convection can have a spatially varying hh ; this constant-coefficient case deliberately isolates the thermal solver before that modeling uncertainty is introduced.

Reference

Back to the eight-case validation summary